Reco Raises $50M to Secure Enterprise AI Agents
Israeli startup Reco has raised $50 million to help enterprises manage security risks as autonomous AI agents take on more operational tasks across business systems.
Reco, an Israeli startup focused on securing AI agents, has raised $50 million in new funding, according to Globes. The round underscores growing investor interest in tools that help enterprises manage the security risks introduced by autonomous AI agents operating across business systems.
Details on the round's investors, valuation or total funding to date were not disclosed in available reporting. The company is positioned in the emerging category of AI agent security, a segment that has gained urgency as organizations deploy more autonomous software to handle tasks once performed by employees.
As AI agents take on more operational responsibility — accessing data, triggering workflows, interacting with customers — they also expand the attack surface enterprises must defend. Funding rounds like this signal that the market now treats agent security as a distinct, fundable category rather than an extension of traditional identity or endpoint security.
For leaders driving AI adoption, this is a reminder that scaling autonomous systems requires parallel investment in oversight, permissions and monitoring. Without it, the same agents designed to improve service speed and efficiency can become new points of failure, data exposure or reputational risk.
— $50 million raised by Reco in its latest funding round.
Every wave of automation creates a matching wave of risk management spend, and AI agents are no exception. The interesting part isn't the check size — it's what it says about where enterprise trust in AI currently sits.
Most organizations are racing to deploy AI agents faster than they're building the guardrails to govern them, and that gap is exactly where customer trust quietly erodes — through a leaked record, a rogue action, or a decision no one can explain after the fact. Security funding rounds like this are really a proxy for how immature agent governance still is across the industry. The operators who win won't be the ones with the flashiest agents, but the ones who can prove — to customers, regulators and their own boards — that those agents are accountable by design, not bolted on after something breaks.
